Servers and working conditions
We agree the server list, roles, responsible people, access and maintenance windows. We identify particularly sensitive systems and test exclusions.
Server audit
We review the configuration and security of Windows and Linux servers. We assess administrator access, updates, backups and monitoring. The report explains what needs improving and the recommended order of work.
Trusted by
A working server and its services do not by themselves confirm that security controls are correct. We review agreed servers, authentication, updates and dependencies. We check whether logs help identify failures or unauthorised access and whether service recovery is supported. The scope can include physical servers, virtual machines and virtualisation hosts.
Some findings require work beyond the operating system itself. We recommend further work based on confirmed findings.
TÜV NORD Polska has certified Virtline’s information security management system to PN-EN ISO/IEC 27001:2023-08. The published certificate states its scope and validity.
View Virtline’s certificateBefore the review, we identify critical systems and agree what to do if a check could disrupt a service.
We agree the server list, roles, responsible people, access and maintenance windows. We identify particularly sensitive systems and test exclusions.
We examine agreed settings, reports, accounts and services. We verify tool output in the context of the system; additional scans or intensive tests require agreement.
We describe the problems, how they were checked and our recommendations. We explain review limitations and changes that need consultation with the application owner.
We deliver the report to administrators and decision-makers. Implementation and rechecking selected findings can be commissioned under a separate scope.
Practical scope
We relate each finding to the system reviewed and its role in your business, not just to a tool’s output.
Roles, services, unnecessary functions, connection settings and available updates. We identify the versions checked and limitations such as application requirements that constrain updates.
Administrator practices, service accounts and remote sign-in. We check excessive access, whether changes can be traced and how permissions are withdrawn.
Backup coverage, available restore-test results, event records and notifications. If a restore test was not part of the engagement, we do not present it as a test we performed.
Proposed changes with priorities and dependencies. We identify work that requires downtime, further checks or involvement from the application provider.
An audit does not authorise production updates, service shutdowns or permission changes. Such work requires agreement, an impact assessment and recovery arrangements. A review does not replace a full penetration test or post-incident investigation, nor does it establish the absence of all vulnerabilities.
Some information can be collected with read-only permissions or with an administrator’s help. For deeper checks, we agree the access required and how it will be protected. We do not ask you to send passwords through the form.
Yes. We tailor the scope to specific systems and services, such as file, web, mail, database and virtualisation services. We agree the versions, components and exclusions before starting.
Many checks can be performed without shutting down services. However, we do not assume every test has no operational impact. Tests that could place a load on a system or require a restart are agreed separately and planned with the administrator.
We can agree a follow-up review of selected problems after changes have been implemented. Its scope and timing are agreed separately. We provide the results of checks, not merely confirmation that someone says a recommendation was implemented.
Include the server count, operating systems and main applications. Describe the purpose of the review and your preferred deadline. Do not send passwords or confidential configurations through the form.
Discuss a server audit