Three people at a station with a board and coloured elements in an office.

2026 threat landscape

Cybercrime persists: a business protection plan

ENISA describes a diverse threat landscape and the exploitation of vulnerabilities. Businesses need MFA, updates, monitoring, incident response and tested recovery. The Joint Cyber Unit provides context for EU cooperation, not a substitute for an organisation's own controls.

Written and maintained by: Virtline team

Threat landscape and Joint Cyber Unit status

ENISA Threat Landscape 2026, published on 22 September 2026, covers 1 January to 31 December 2025. It provides a current reference for assessing threats, rather than a record of every incident in the current year. The European Commission proposed the Joint Cyber Unit in 2021; its official factsheet was updated on 30 January 2023. The proposal document alone does not establish implementation or current operational status.

Sources, entry points and reduced exposure

Confirm the context in primary sources first, then reduce account takeover and the exploitation of known vulnerabilities.

ENISA 2026 report

The ENISA report presents threats observed in 2025 and their impact on organisations in the European Union.

Joint Cyber Unit - Commission source

The factsheet describes the Commission's 2021 proposal and purpose; it is not proof of the initiative's current operational status.

Identity and access

MFA for administrators, email, VPN and cloud, separate privileged accounts, access reviews and prompt revocation.

Vulnerabilities and exposure

Inventory, risk priority, a remediation deadline, formal exceptions and retesting shorten system exposure.

Response, re­silience, audit and operations

These areas connect threat detection with service recovery, gap assessment and the daily operation of safeguards.

Detection and decision

An alert needs asset context, an owner and an escalation threshold, and must lead to isolation, communication and evidence preservation.

Service recovery

Segregated copies and regular recovery tests limit the impact of an event that preventive controls did not stop.

Audit and evidence

An audit structures critical services, gaps, priorities and control evidence for management, customers or regulators.

Managed operations

Ongoing support is needed when alerts, updates, backups and access require daily ownership rather than a one-off project.

Incident detection must lead to a decision

An alert alone does not limit an attack. The organisation needs asset context, an accountable person, escalation criteria and a prepared follow-up action. Monitoring should connect to incident handling, communication, evidence preservation and the decision to restore a service.

SOC, SIEM and response instructions

Define log sources, detection scenarios, priorities, on-call coverage, response times and event-closure instructions.

Email and phishing

Protect the channel attackers use to take over accounts, redirect payments or convince users to run a file.

Backup and recovery

Segregated copies and regular recovery tests are needed when preventive protection does not stop an event.

A minimum resilience plan for business

Begin with critical services and real business impact. Only then select tools, logging scope and work order. Every action should have an owner, a deadline and evidence of completion.

  • Identify critical services, data, administrator accounts, external connections and suppliers with environment access.
  • Enforce MFA and separate standard and administrator accounts; schedule reviews and prompt access revocation when staff leave.
  • Establish a vulnerability detection, prioritisation, remediation and retest cycle with an exception-acceptance process.
  • Enable logs for defined scenarios and exercise escalation, isolation, communication and evidence preservation.
  • Test service recovery from backups and update the plan after infrastructure, supplier or business-process changes.

When an audit or managed service is needed

An audit helps when an organisation does not know its complete asset scope, lacks a shared priority list or must demonstrate control operation to a customer, board or regulator. A managed service is needed when alerts, updates, backups and access require daily accountability rather than a one-off project.

NIS2 audit

Assessment of risk, incidents, continuity, ICT suppliers, technical measures and control evidence.

Cybersecurity programme

Identity, endpoint, network, email, monitoring, vulnerability and response measures in one plan.

IT outsourcing

Account, device, backup, update and ticket management with assigned operational responsibility.

ENISA current threat landscape
MFA identity protection
Monitoring detection and escalation
Recovery tested restoration

Trusted by

Companies and institutions that need stable IT.

  • AdAc
  • Baseline
  • BTW
  • Charlie
  • Dako
  • EVO
  • FTH
  • IFJ
  • MAEM
  • Banki Spółdzielcze BPS
  • PJG
  • Spinel Trade
  • Suder
  • Ziko Apteka
  • Aforti
  • Base Finance
  • CADM
  • Consol
  • Deka Trans
  • Ferro
  • GATE
  • Igoria Trade
  • Magnet Audit
  • Novacura
  • Przetargi
  • Streamsoft
  • VUMO
  • Audytplus
  • BKB Kancelaria Prawna
  • CBT
  • Contimax
  • ERBET
  • FOMACH
  • Geotermia Podhalańska
  • LATIS
  • Metgal
  • PIBR
  • Spontex
  • Super Krak
  • Wolimex

Questions and answers

Is there one dominant type of cyberattack in 2026?

+

The landscape should not be reduced to one attack type. ENISA describes different groups, tools and techniques, so businesses should combine account protection, vulnerability management, monitoring, response and recovery.

What is the Joint Cyber Unit?

+

It is an initiative proposed by the European Commission in 2021 as a cooperation platform for cybersecurity communities and existing networks. The historical proposal is neither a substitute for an organisation's own controls nor proof of current implementation status.

Which safeguards should a business implement first?

+

Start with an inventory of critical services and owners, MFA for high-impact accounts, vulnerability controls, logs for defined scenarios, an incident procedure and regular recovery tests.

Is buying a security tool enough?

+

No. A tool needs a defined scope, owner, current configuration, data-quality monitoring, response procedure and evidence of recurring maintenance. Without a process, even good technology may not limit incident impact.

Let us define the first actions that reduce risk

Describe critical services, current safeguards and the problem you need to solve. Virtline will help define the review scope, priorities and evidence required to close the most important gaps.

Book a consultation